|
User loginNavigation |
involvement of prosecutors questioned in Blount CountySubmitted by mello on Tue, 09/25/2007 - 08:54.
What does this all mean? |
Upcoming eventsSearchLocal area websites:Blount DemsMC Democrats Raven Society League of Women Voters Wendy Pitts Reeves KnoxViews Knox Dems RoaneViews TennViews TN Clean Water Network TN Dems Government websites:Blount CountyCity of Alcoa City of Maryville State of Tennessee TN Code Annotated TN General Assembly UT CTAS UT MTAS Media websites:Maryville Daily TimesBlount Today Blount County Voice Knox News Sentinel Knoxville Voice |
What it sounds like to me is that prosecutors came in to court expecting a routine rubber stamp dismissal of the defense motion, and instead ran into a judge that wants every i dotted and every t crossed, especially in a capital case, and also a judge who wants to get to the bottom of any claims of prosecutorial misconduct.
We need to remember this when the "good old boys" put Judge Meares in their crosshairs.
Although I would say advantage Meares. Unlike many of his counterparts - he at least seems to understand the law.
a few things on this case to note also:
1. after the trial both ed bailey and kirk andrews quit the da's office.
2. stacey sudderth's trial was held in knox county last year/ early this year because his attorney on his case said that he couldn't get a fair trial in blount county. he was acquitted of all charges. also note, he was out on bail for 6 years until he went to trial. he is the guy who "ordered" the hit.
3. ac copeland has been the only person convicted in this case.
4. a smoking box of evidence that was now where to be found for copeland's trial, suddenly reappeared for sudderth's trial. the tapes of the interviews were in this box. detective manuel swore under oath that no such tapes existed. det. manuel also quit the BCSO after this case went to trial.
You may find this report interesting.
Link...
Post new comment